Welcome to support forum
Feel free to post any questions you have about using the site, verification, technical support, bugs, suggestions, etc. We are here to help! :)
Suggestions for new features
6 year(s) ago • 31116 views • 322 replies
CGBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Where did the 'Completed, unverified profiles you haven't voted for' disappear from the front page? If I got bored, I used it to scout whether somebody confirmedably legit needed my points. 'People you may know' on the other hand is worthless: it's people who I DO know, and have also Friended + voted for on the site. :)
I just removed it during a performance analysis, found out that list alone took 4-5 seconds to load, which was a lot of stress on the server when everyone are on the front page all the time. For now, you can access the full list here instead: https://beltchecker.com/n[...]dvotes.php
SMBlack beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
A list of people you may know, who have verified IDs, but for whom you have not voted, would be pretty handy.
![Slideyfoot [jun]](userimg/5e25cf311adfd.jpg){kind=small}
SJBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
A list of people you may know, who have verified IDs, but for whom you have not voted, would be pretty handy.
Yep: right now, I just guess by regularly clicking on people in my friends list to check on the ones who might have got İD verified recently. An automated 'friends with verified İD and unverified belt' would make that much more efficient, if it doesn't already exist. Or just 'friends with verified İD', that would help too. ;)
SMBlack beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
Yep. Although the premade filters of same academy, same affiliation, same city (same us state or within-20km would be fantastic) I feel would be more useful than being on friends list, which requires me to go find them in the first place.
SJBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Depends: I have a looooot of friends around the world thanks to all the camps, so friends list much more useful to me than some local filter. But yeah, I could see that being helpful too.
CGBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
A list of people you may know, who have verified IDs, but for whom you have not voted, would be pretty handy.
It's right there at the top of the "people you may know" page :)
https://www.beltchecker.c[...]ayknow.php
https://www.beltchecker.c[...]ayknow.php
SMBlack beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
That’s what it *says* but not what it is though. At least I get people who have non verified ids and people I have already voted for.
CGBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
That’s what it *says* but not what it is though. At least I get people who have non verified ids and people I have already voted for.
That's strange; works for me. Can you post a screenshot of the profiles you see on the list and let me know which of them doesn't fit the filter?
SJBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Works for me too, checking it just now.
SMBlack beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
Everyone on my 'you may know' page is either not yet ID verified, or else I have already voted for them.
CGBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Everyone on my 'you may know' page is either not yet ID verified, or else I have already voted for them.
Ah, I see why you read it wrong. It is because the top box is empty that you think it's a headline for the entire page. "Complete profiles you may know and have not voted for yet" is the title for only the top box. Notice how there are other titles for the other boxes :) So it does in fact work correctly.
For reference, see how mine looks:
For reference, see how mine looks:
SMBlack beltVerified
SMBlack beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
OHHH thanks Christian, now I get it. I just have all lazy friends.
CGBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
OHHH thanks Christian, now I get it. I just have all lazy friends.
That, or you just vote for them all right away :D
RDBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I suggest we top out at the required points instead of earning any more.
It levels the playing field and this way folks can focus on either getting other verified or disputing questionable claims and taking part in the forums.
It levels the playing field and this way folks can focus on either getting other verified or disputing questionable claims and taking part in the forums.
TPBlack beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
I suggest we top out at the required points instead of earning any more. It levels the playing field and this way folks can focus on either getting other verified or disputing questionable claims and taking part in the forums.
Not a bad idea in my opinion. As it would lessen the "popularity contest" nature of the site, that is off-putting to many potential newcomers.
There should still be the possibility to vote, as the comments & testimonials are a nice part of the system, but the point count could cut off at the required number (like LinkedIn connections cut off at 500, after which it's just "500+" ).
This would ofc then obviate the "Most trusted" lists in the stats page and the top-5 on the front page. Which is kinda the point too. :)
Perhaps Christian will be more open to the idea once Pedro Duarte dethrones him from the #1 spot. :D
There should still be the possibility to vote, as the comments & testimonials are a nice part of the system, but the point count could cut off at the required number (like LinkedIn connections cut off at 500, after which it's just "500+" ).
This would ofc then obviate the "Most trusted" lists in the stats page and the top-5 on the front page. Which is kinda the point too. :)
Perhaps Christian will be more open to the idea once Pedro Duarte dethrones him from the #1 spot. :D
Edited 6 year(s) ago
RDBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Not a bad idea in my opinion. As it would lessen the 'popularity contest' nature of the site, that is off-putting to many potential newcomers. There should still be the possibility to vote, as the comments & testimonials are a nice part of the system, but the point count could cut off at the required number (like LinkedIn connections cut off at 500, after which it's just '500+' ). This would ofc then obviate the 'Most trusted' lists in the stats page and the top-5 on the front page. Which is kinda the point too. :) Perhaps Christian will be more open to the idea once Pedro Duarte dethrones him from the #1 spot. :D
Lol The last statement cracked me up. good one Tatu
CBBlack belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Search by Location. I'm sure I know a bunch of legit Santa Cruz,CA jiujiteiros who I could be helping to verify (once I'm there myself), but a lot of folks I know by face, belt-level, and propensity to knee slice or whatever. Haha. A search by location could help create community. Or perhaps a forum for regions?
FPurple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
Maybe some feature for public trip (same as cs) but for looking recommendation for club?
Also some map widget for visited club..but i guess its bit complicated..:D
Also some map widget for visited club..but i guess its bit complicated..:D
CGBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Maybe some feature for public trip (same as cs) but for looking recommendation for club? Also some map widget for visited club..but i guess its bit complicated..:D
I’ve already built something like this with BJJ Globetrotters :)
Edited 6 year(s) ago
WMBlack belt 5th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Donate button attached to PayPal so people can chip in to help defray site costs?
Or just list the donations PayPal email address?
Or just list the donations PayPal email address?
Edited 6 year(s) ago
CGBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Donate button attached to PayPal so people can chip in to help defray site costs? Or just list the donations PayPal email address?
I don't like to ask money for "nothing". I have a few ideas, though, to get a bit of money in to cover costs for server, etc. Here is one ;)
RDBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I don't like to ask money for 'nothing'. I have a few ideas, though, to get a bit of money in to cover costs for server, etc. Here is one ;)
Thats actually friggin cool.
Does it come with a Walmart discount? ;-)
Does it come with a Walmart discount? ;-)
RDBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Donate button attached to PayPal so people can chip in to help defray site costs? Or just list the donations PayPal email address?
I like this idea.
RDBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Maybe set it up so when you select black belt you are forced to enter all your previous belts before being open for voting.
This way the entitled types will be forced to play by the rules.
This way the entitled types will be forced to play by the rules.
TPBlack beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
Maybe set it up so when you select black belt you are forced to enter all your previous belts before being open for voting. This way the entitled types will be forced to play by the rules.
I think this has been suggested before, but some people (although rare) have actually skipped some colored belts, so the option to leave them out is there.
RDBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I think this has been suggested before, but some people (although rare) have actually skipped some colored belts, so the option to leave them out is there.
....
SCBlack belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
dont knwo if this has been addressed but when a person gets promoted. THe previous comments shouldne be wiped out completely. just the points.. it kinda sucks the heartfelt comments someone may have left gets erased when they get promoted..
CGBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
dont knwo if this has been addressed but when a person gets promoted. THe previous comments shouldne be wiped out completely. just the points.. it kinda sucks the heartfelt comments someone may have left gets erased when they get promoted..
They don't get erased. When the voter reconfirm the vote, the prior comment is there in the comment field by default.
SCBlack belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
They don't get erased. When the voter reconfirm the vote, the prior comment is there in the comment field by default.
my bad i meand the reply comments are erased. someone wrote something and i replied to the comment.. now they arent there anymore.
