RegisterLog in
Main forum

Linage / affiliate

6 year(s) ago • 363 views • 3 replies

James Saks
James Saks
Black belt 1st degreeVerified28 forum posts4015/1000
6 year(s) ago
If a picture is all it takes what stopping someone with out affiliation and lineage putting on a gi and a black belt starting an academy and promoting people?

I think lineage should be a requirement or at least a link to a black belt?
Edited 6 year(s) ago
Christian Graugart
Christian Graugart
Black belt 4th degreeVerified4321 forum posts39320/1000
6 year(s) ago
If by “lineage” you mean proof of who promoted you, this is already possible since you can “tag” a profile in your promotion history and this person can confirm or reject it.

But to make a mandatory lineage field wouldn’t make much sense since it’s impossible to verify, unless every single instructor in the world is on beltchecker.

And not everyone has an affiliation, so wouldn’t make sense to require that either.
Edited 6 year(s) ago
Christian Graugart
Christian Graugart
Black belt 4th degreeVerified4321 forum posts39320/1000
6 year(s) ago
But at the end or the day, the community decides through voting what their criteria for verification will be. If enough people decide that lineage and affiliation should be required, then that will be the law of the land here :) (just like filling out a complete promotion history has become)
Edited 6 year(s) ago
James Saks
James SaksOP
Black belt 1st degreeVerified28 forum posts4015/1000
6 year(s) ago
Ok makes sense. But I do think that it should go deeper than just who promoted you but who premoted them.

It's also nice to be able to trace back to the masters and see that on your profile.
Edited 6 year(s) ago

Post a reply

Add a quote
 
Changes saved
Success
An error occured
Required fields missing
This person is already on Beltchecker.