RegisterLog in
Main forum

contracts vs month to month

5 year(s) ago • 506 views • 6 replies

Chance Harris
Chance Harris
Brown beltPending37 forum posts0/700
5 year(s) ago
So Im curious to know what thoughts people have on contract vs month to month payments at academies. I think there are obvious benefits to both. Also what is the most insane contract situation you've ever encountered?

I was told about one gym that had 3 year contracts! 3 years?! I won't say what gym it was because this post isn't about putting them on blast, but I think it was absolutely absurd.
Drew Brunning
Drew Brunning
Black beltVerified235 forum posts3190/1000
5 year(s) ago
I've had both and I personally prefer month-to-month as a student, but also understand that contracts allow owners/instructors to guarantee some income and act as a barrier for folks who will quit when it gets hard. I think gyms that offer different payment options (such as month-to-month at X, 3 month contract at Y, 1 year contract at Z) end up having the best of both worlds in that they offer both the flexibility if the student needs it and the guaranteed income for the instructor (with a discount for the student) when that makes sense for the student.
Karl Krebs
Karl Krebs
Brown beltPending40 forum posts0/700
5 year(s) ago
Our gym has a Month to Month option or a 6-month commitment that goes month to month when its completed. The 6 months is cheaper and it's what people usually go with. I think its important to have a month-to-month option for those who want it but I don't see contracts as inherently wrong.

I think Drew did a good job explaining why contracts can be important!
Chance Harris
Chance HarrisOP
Brown beltPending37 forum posts0/700
5 year(s) ago
Our gym has a Month to Month option or a 6-month commitment that goes month to month when its completed. The 6 months is cheaper and it's what people usually go with. I think its important to have a month-to-month option for those who want it but I don't see contracts as inherently wrong. I think Drew did a good job explaining why contracts can be important!
Agreed, I'm definitely not against contracts, the few gyms ive been at in the past all had 6 month contracts, the gym im at now is month to month only. I just thought a 3 year commitment at the one gym was just insane to me though.
Bridget Jack Jeffries
Bridget Jack Jeffries
Blue beltVerified621 forum posts3340/200
5 year(s) ago
Obviously month-to-month is better for students and contracts are generally better for the business. And I respect that gym owners gotta eat and need an idea of what kind of income they're looking at for the near future.

That said, when I've talked to other students about why they don't train at some other gyms in the area, the #1 reason they give is contracts / high-pressure sales tactics.
Slideyfoot [jun]
Slideyfoot [jun]
Black belt 1st degreeVerified1900 forum posts3635/1000
5 year(s) ago
I have never used contracts at my gym, I don't like them. As a school owner myself, I can understand it gives some financial stability as it's nice to be more certain about income staying regular, but I prefer to be more flexible. My membership fees are monthly, normally standing order, but some people just do a bank transfer each month.

Due to that, I've also been able to benefit from people travelling through Bristol who are only going to be there for a few months. That's meant I've had some cool people on the mats, like this chap who works in the film industry and has trained all over the place. He's only ever in one spot for a few months at a time working on a film, so if he'd only had the option of training at gyms with a contract, he wouldn't have been able to get on the mats (or he'd have had to spend a buttload of money on training he couldn't use).
Edited 5 year(s) ago

Post a reply

Add a quote
 
Changes saved
Success
An error occured
Required fields missing
This person is already on Beltchecker.