Rules for main forums
- Be nice
- No advertisement
- No events
- No fundraisers
- No topics asking for votes
- Only posts related to Brazilian Jiu Jitsu
Looking at chokes academically
5 year(s) ago • 847 views • 11 replies
NTBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
I’ll need to find the actual article but found it interesting that there’s a growing amount of published literature of bjj, mma health effects
https://www.tandfonline.c[...]20.1780873
https://www.tandfonline.c[...]20.1780873
JBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
That's spectacular!
NTBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
That's spectacular!
The primary author has other stuff published too. I will have to check some of that out
JMBlack belt 2nd degreeVerified
NTBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
JMBlack belt 2nd degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
I'd assume given the study design and number of participants, the times by technique are not statistically significant.
NTBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
I'd assume given the study design and number of participants, the times by technique are not statistically significant.
Yes, design critiques aside. I’m just tickled they studied and published this period
JBlack belt 4th degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
Findings of the study
Whoever was doing the triangle choke was terrible at triangle chokes. That should have been way, way lower. Who did the chokes? This guy:
JMBlack belt 2nd degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
Another question is that considering the recent talks about strangles and strokes... How the hell did they get an ethics committee approval for that study?!?
NTBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
Another question is that considering the recent talks about strangles and strokes... How the hell did they get an ethics committee approval for that study?!?
Lol excellent point
PDBlack belt 3rd degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
Another question is that considering the recent talks about strangles and strokes... How the hell did they get an ethics committee approval for that study?!?
I am a little skeptical of the study for as I am thinking just for basic liability and health reasons it could be a huge issue.. Also how to the consistently monitor exactly how the choke is being technically applied.. Just way to many variables .. The last thing by personal experience in these chokes it doesn't make sense..
That said the more valid information of the mechanisms of submission both for technical data and safety is great
That said the more valid information of the mechanisms of submission both for technical data and safety is great
SBBlack belt 1st degreeVerified
5 year(s) ago
I am a little skeptical of the study for as I am thinking just for basic liability and health reasons it could be a huge issue.. Also how to the consistently monitor exactly how the choke is being technically applied.. Just way to many variables .. The last thing by personal experience in these chokes it doesn't make sense.. That said the more valid information of the mechanisms of submission both for technical data and safety is great
Taylor and Francis will publish ANYTHING. This isn't even junk science. It is junk opinion. The same author did a "study" on strokes and chokes. He used a convenience survey in a few online BJJ forums. He found that chokes are safe based on the responses of the people who frequent online forums that are geared towards BJJ. How many stroke victims are still doing BJJ or MMA? How many stroke victims are trolling around MMA.TV after the sport caused a stroke? Now I'm certain that BJJ is safe and that stroke isn't a major concern, but don't dip into a self-serving pool of participants and pretend it is science.
