Rules for main forums
- Be nice
- No advertisement
- No events
- No fundraisers
- No topics asking for votes
- Only posts related to Brazilian Jiu Jitsu
Longest lineage on Beltchecker?
2 year(s) ago • 16784 views • 44 replies
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Out of interest, who do you think has the longest lineage on Beltchecker? How many generations deep, with Maeda as number one?
And what is the longest lineage on Beltchecker where it is easy to check all steps going back to at least the well known names of the 90:s?
Not everyone agrees on from what degree (0:th-3:rd?) you should be able to promote others to BB. With low degree BB:s doing the deed, there can be a lot of new "lineage generations" in a short time period, but that can also be the result of honoring your everyday instructor by adding him/her to the lineage even if the BB was formally from someone else.
When I started training (mid 90:s), reviewing lineages was very easy. Basically all instructors sought out by gringos could tell their lineage in seconds, with very few levels involved. Now, I sometimes see really long ones with a lot of names I've never heard of and don't even find good info on through google. Not many years from now (if not already), I see a lot of BB claims will be totally unverifiable, when it comes to legitimacy through lineage.
Perhaps, it's unavoidable that it will all just go back to being jiu-jitsu with some old traditionalists revering a few lineages with verifiability preserved over the years but that no young people will really care about, as everything in the game could just as well had been tested out and developed yesterday more or less from scratch by an AI (that could be fed with your own exact body type etc), with the same resulting style :-)
And what is the longest lineage on Beltchecker where it is easy to check all steps going back to at least the well known names of the 90:s?
Not everyone agrees on from what degree (0:th-3:rd?) you should be able to promote others to BB. With low degree BB:s doing the deed, there can be a lot of new "lineage generations" in a short time period, but that can also be the result of honoring your everyday instructor by adding him/her to the lineage even if the BB was formally from someone else.
When I started training (mid 90:s), reviewing lineages was very easy. Basically all instructors sought out by gringos could tell their lineage in seconds, with very few levels involved. Now, I sometimes see really long ones with a lot of names I've never heard of and don't even find good info on through google. Not many years from now (if not already), I see a lot of BB claims will be totally unverifiable, when it comes to legitimacy through lineage.
Perhaps, it's unavoidable that it will all just go back to being jiu-jitsu with some old traditionalists revering a few lineages with verifiability preserved over the years but that no young people will really care about, as everything in the game could just as well had been tested out and developed yesterday more or less from scratch by an AI (that could be fed with your own exact body type etc), with the same resulting style :-)
Black beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
Kano-Maeda-Carlos-Helio-Rickson-Marcelo Behring-Max Trombini-Jon Kelly- me.
Not obnoxious, but a lot of links in the chain.
Not obnoxious, but a lot of links in the chain.
Black belt 1st degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Kanō Jigorō > Tomita Tsunejirō > Mitsuyo Maeda > Carlos Gracie Sr. > Helio Gracie > Carlos Gracie jr.> Roger Gracie > Nicholas Hunter Brooks (> Holger Jonny Weber) > Sebastian Ellinghaus
JohanOP
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Kano-Maeda-Carlos-Helio-Rickson-Marcelo Behring-Max Trombini-Jon Kelly- me. Not obnoxious, but a lot of links in the chain.
That's an eight with Maeda. Just one more than me. Still quite a short lineage now adays!
First random dude waiting for verification which I clicked was eleven in the lineage. And I'm sure I've seen longer lineages than that here.
First random dude waiting for verification which I clicked was eleven in the lineage. And I'm sure I've seen longer lineages than that here.
JohanOP
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Kanō Jigorō > Tomita Tsunejirō > Mitsuyo Maeda > Carlos Gracie Sr. > Helio Gracie > Carlos Gracie jr.> Roger Gracie > Nicholas Hunter Brooks (> Holger Jonny Weber) > Sebastian Ellinghaus
Still an eight :-)
No cheating including lineage before Maeda or for that matter putting Jacyntho Ferro between Maeda and Gracie (true as it may be : -).
I guess five is shortest lineage of any BB on Beltchecker and four is shortest of anyone alive today. Or have I missed some one?
No cheating including lineage before Maeda or for that matter putting Jacyntho Ferro between Maeda and Gracie (true as it may be : -).
I guess five is shortest lineage of any BB on Beltchecker and four is shortest of anyone alive today. Or have I missed some one?
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Maeda> Carlos > Carlson > Clovis > Me.
feels like an honor to be in the 5 group!
clean water comes from high up on the mountain!
feels like an honor to be in the 5 group!
clean water comes from high up on the mountain!
Black belt 4th degreeVerified
Black belt 1st degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
https://www.beltchecker.c[...]p?id=42742
My (still unverified) instructor’s lineage is:
Kano > Maeda > Carlos Gracie > Helio Gracie > Carlson Gracie > Francisco “Toco” Albuquerque > Robert Schwartz (my instructor)
My (still unverified) instructor’s lineage is:
Kano > Maeda > Carlos Gracie > Helio Gracie > Carlson Gracie > Francisco “Toco” Albuquerque > Robert Schwartz (my instructor)
JohanOP
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
You're all just a bunch of losers! Except for Patrick and Sebastian who are so far in the lead with 8-long lineages.
Remember we're trying to find the LONGEST lineages here :-)
Cool with 5-groupers though and would be interesting to hear if there's a 4-grouper on Beltchecker.
Remember we're trying to find the LONGEST lineages here :-)
Cool with 5-groupers though and would be interesting to hear if there's a 4-grouper on Beltchecker.
Purple beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
I have also 8...: Mitsuyo Maeda > Carlos Gracie > Helio Gracie > Rolls Gracie > Romero Cavalcanti > Eduardo da Conceição > Lucio Linhares > Sami Harju > Me
Blue beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
I have a few possible interpretations, as the head coach at my gym is a black belt under 3 people (Telles, Terere, and Careca), all with slightly different lineages. But picking the longest chain, I have 10:
Mitsuyo Maeda > Carlos Gracie > Helio Gracie > Rolls Gracie > Romero Cavalcanti > Alexandre Paiva > Fernando Augusto Terere > Pedro Bessa > Tom Showler > Me
If I go by Telles I get 9, and by Careca I get 8.
Mitsuyo Maeda > Carlos Gracie > Helio Gracie > Rolls Gracie > Romero Cavalcanti > Alexandre Paiva > Fernando Augusto Terere > Pedro Bessa > Tom Showler > Me
If I go by Telles I get 9, and by Careca I get 8.
Black belt 4th degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
So what happens if you’ve been training under someone but someone else promoted you. And what if you’ve been promoted by and training with multiple people along the way. Lineage concept does not seem capable of containing this sort of data structure 😄
Black beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
So what happens if you’ve been training under someone but someone else promoted you. And what if you’ve been promoted by and training with multiple people along the way. Lineage concept does not seem capable of containing this sort of data structure 😄
Can’t really be used by any organization that uses grading boards either. I guess it becomes more of a “I identify as a student of _______” kind of thing.
Black belt 1st degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
It is 11 when You accept it all started with Kano Jigoro and not Maeda who was picked by Kano to spread Judo over the world. 🫣
fun fact by the way:
My verifiable Judo-lineage is even shorter than my BJJ-lineage.
There were only 3 japanese guys (incl. Kano himself), a belgian Judoka and my teacher before me.💁🏻♂️
But in Judo nobody is interested in stuff like lineages.😆
fun fact by the way:
My verifiable Judo-lineage is even shorter than my BJJ-lineage.
There were only 3 japanese guys (incl. Kano himself), a belgian Judoka and my teacher before me.💁🏻♂️
But in Judo nobody is interested in stuff like lineages.😆
Edited 2 year(s) ago
JohanOP
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
So what happens if you’ve been training under someone but someone else promoted you. And what if you’ve been promoted by and training with multiple people along the way. Lineage concept does not seem capable of containing this sort of data structure 😄
Nah, multiple lineages are ok ;-)
There's of course both the by-the-power-vested-in-them-by-the-holy-two-stripes-lineages and the practical lineage with who actually helped them acquire most of their knowledge. Where it seems as if most on Beltchecker list the latter as their actual lineage (which I like, but want to check the former before verifying).
There's of course both the by-the-power-vested-in-them-by-the-holy-two-stripes-lineages and the practical lineage with who actually helped them acquire most of their knowledge. Where it seems as if most on Beltchecker list the latter as their actual lineage (which I like, but want to check the former before verifying).
Black beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
It is 11 when You accept it all started with Kano Jigoro and not Maeda who was picked by Kano to spread Judo over the world. 🫣 fun fact by the way: My verifiable Judo-lineage is even shorter than my BJJ-lineage. There were only 3 japanese guys (incl. Kano himself), a belgian Judoka and my teacher before me.💁🏻♂️ But in Judo nobody is interested in stuff like lineages.😆
That is kind of the Judo way. You get from white to brown via your coaches and then shodan and up via grading boards.
I think because Judo has been regulated longer, with regional and national grading boards, that any kind of “lineage” is often irrelevant.
I think because Judo has been regulated longer, with regional and national grading boards, that any kind of “lineage” is often irrelevant.
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
I think because Judo has been regulated longer, with regional and national grading boards, that any kind of “lineage” is often irrelevant.
I agree. Coming from a strong pre-Olympic judo background, I find this whole "lineage" thing truly bizarre. It reminds me of ancestor worship as is practiced in the indigenous south Pacific islands and northwest indigenous American cultures.
Edited 2 year(s) ago
Black beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
I agree. Coming from a strong pre-Olympic judo background, I find this whole 'lineage' thing truly bizarre. It reminds me of ancestor worship as is practiced in the indigenous south Pacific islands and northwest indigenous American cultures.
Euh. I am not sure that is the best comparison and contrast I would have made
Lineage is more looked at as who you received your knowledge from and are they a trusted source to bestow such. It is the same in Academia. Your highest degree earned is looked at closely and to which school conferred that degree and whether not you have the prerequisites to teach, do the job, or act as an expert in that chosen field.
That whole lineage aspect in bjj is viewed in a similiar way. Until we have a "trusted" governing body that can vouch for a person's black belt and that their source has been verified, and the board has deem your knowledge sufficient at a particular black belt rank, we will always ask and question where they received their knowledge from. The best way to do that, as of right now, is to examine a person's lineage (apart from what rolling with them).
Lineage is more looked at as who you received your knowledge from and are they a trusted source to bestow such. It is the same in Academia. Your highest degree earned is looked at closely and to which school conferred that degree and whether not you have the prerequisites to teach, do the job, or act as an expert in that chosen field.
That whole lineage aspect in bjj is viewed in a similiar way. Until we have a "trusted" governing body that can vouch for a person's black belt and that their source has been verified, and the board has deem your knowledge sufficient at a particular black belt rank, we will always ask and question where they received their knowledge from. The best way to do that, as of right now, is to examine a person's lineage (apart from what rolling with them).
JohanOP
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
I agree. Coming from a strong pre-Olympic judo background, I find this whole 'lineage' thing truly bizarre. It reminds me of ancestor worship as is practiced in the indigenous south Pacific islands and northwest indigenous American cultures.
I'm not saying you're wrong.
Within Karate, I experienced a perspective where the revered o-sensei was regarded as the pinnacle of the art and each future generation would try to strive to emulate but would unavoidably deteriorate the style more and more from it's glorious past. Even further back the lineage, where the art was perhaps even more immaculate, was Okinawan farmers or (in the case of jiu-jitsu) the samurai. The former of which I doubt had more time than today's hobbyists to refine technique and the latter which would also prioritize weapons, cooperation and strategy, just like today's elite soldiers are seldom much of a match in sparring for someone focusing only on unarmed combat one on one.
On the other hand, we have the more scientific standing-on-the-shoulders-of-giants-perspective, where each new generation should be better than the last (at least on average in the long run) or something has gone very wrong. Both jeet-kune-do, BJJ and MMA has (had?) philosophies along with that and their times of pioneering martial arts. In academia, there are still brands (basically) around since hundreds of years with well known universities and other institutions carrying much weight, simply because they have made themselves known over many man times for standing for and guaranteeing (in most parts) excellence. They really wouldn't (shouldn't) put their names on anything less than or they would water down their own relevance and value for everyone. Brands should in that sense really be valued (until they're not). That doesn't mean that everyone at Cambridge nowadays are better than those of other universities at Newtonian physics or that a direct traceable teaching lineage to Newton has those guarantees. It can be a Chinese whispering game over the ages but held together with artefacts such as books and other writings and new knowledge added, along with some convergent evolution and so on over the centuries. Even if it would trickle down like genes, we don't share many parts of a percent with an ancestor living hundreds of years ago. Same with lineages - how much genetic material is really unique to those schools sharing the same "lineage ancestor" five steps up? With all instructors in between with different other inputs, preferences, physical and mental attributes and so on.
Lineage is dead! Long live the lineage!
Within Karate, I experienced a perspective where the revered o-sensei was regarded as the pinnacle of the art and each future generation would try to strive to emulate but would unavoidably deteriorate the style more and more from it's glorious past. Even further back the lineage, where the art was perhaps even more immaculate, was Okinawan farmers or (in the case of jiu-jitsu) the samurai. The former of which I doubt had more time than today's hobbyists to refine technique and the latter which would also prioritize weapons, cooperation and strategy, just like today's elite soldiers are seldom much of a match in sparring for someone focusing only on unarmed combat one on one.
On the other hand, we have the more scientific standing-on-the-shoulders-of-giants-perspective, where each new generation should be better than the last (at least on average in the long run) or something has gone very wrong. Both jeet-kune-do, BJJ and MMA has (had?) philosophies along with that and their times of pioneering martial arts. In academia, there are still brands (basically) around since hundreds of years with well known universities and other institutions carrying much weight, simply because they have made themselves known over many man times for standing for and guaranteeing (in most parts) excellence. They really wouldn't (shouldn't) put their names on anything less than or they would water down their own relevance and value for everyone. Brands should in that sense really be valued (until they're not). That doesn't mean that everyone at Cambridge nowadays are better than those of other universities at Newtonian physics or that a direct traceable teaching lineage to Newton has those guarantees. It can be a Chinese whispering game over the ages but held together with artefacts such as books and other writings and new knowledge added, along with some convergent evolution and so on over the centuries. Even if it would trickle down like genes, we don't share many parts of a percent with an ancestor living hundreds of years ago. Same with lineages - how much genetic material is really unique to those schools sharing the same "lineage ancestor" five steps up? With all instructors in between with different other inputs, preferences, physical and mental attributes and so on.
Lineage is dead! Long live the lineage!
Black belt 4th degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Jigoro Kano, Maeda, Carlos Gracie, Carlson Gracie, Ricardo De La Riva, Moacir ‘Boca’ Oliveira, me
Purple beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
Mitsuyo Maeda > Carlos Gracie > Helio Gracie > Rickson Gracie > Jorge Pereira > Leo Dalla > Lloyd Irvin > Shawn Hammonds > Andrew Browne
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Lineage is more looked at as who you received your knowledge from and are they a trusted source to bestow such. It is the same in Academia. Your highest degree earned is looked at closely and to which school conferred that degree and whether not you have the prerequisites to teach, do the job, or act as an expert in that chosen field.
I understand your point. I'm talking about an impression here. I can certainly understand asking about whom you learned your BJJ from. It's the taking it back so many generations that I find cumbersome. Since everyone traces back to Kano, Maeda and the Gracies, it seems somewhat arbitrary to stop there. After all, Kano learned from various masters in other ju-jutsu ryus, so one could in theory go back indefinitely. To your analogy, the lineage isn't asking what institution or school you learned at. It's specifically asking about the line of instructors. If you graduated Harvard, no one is going to ask you who was the professor who taught your faculty advisor, and who taught him, etc.
Black belt 1st degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Mitsuyo Maeda > Carlos Gracie > Helio Gracie > Francisco Mansur > Joe Moreira > Me
Mansur is still alive and in his 90's... he started training with Helio when he was a teen and was promoted from beginner all the way to red belt by Helio. I have no doubt he is one of the very last living instructors that is only 4 generations deep back to Maeda.
Moreira is in his 60's, is five generations (counting from Maeda), and is soon eligible for his Red belt himself, so I doubt we are going to find very many people still alive at less than five generations deep...
and
I'm really not sure what the fascination is with MORE generations... seems like that would just mean more chance to be watered down from the fundamentals that made Jiu-Jitsu so desirable for a lot of us older grapplers in the first place - Just my opinion.
Mansur is still alive and in his 90's... he started training with Helio when he was a teen and was promoted from beginner all the way to red belt by Helio. I have no doubt he is one of the very last living instructors that is only 4 generations deep back to Maeda.
Moreira is in his 60's, is five generations (counting from Maeda), and is soon eligible for his Red belt himself, so I doubt we are going to find very many people still alive at less than five generations deep...
and
I'm really not sure what the fascination is with MORE generations... seems like that would just mean more chance to be watered down from the fundamentals that made Jiu-Jitsu so desirable for a lot of us older grapplers in the first place - Just my opinion.
Blue beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
What is the purpose of a lineage? I’ve never really grasped it. You don’t have any of their blood running through your veins. How much of that lineage actually plays in to the way you do jiu jitsu? Even if you have someone who is a Roger Gracie black belt, then that person goes on to teach. It’s very unlikely that the students will develop a Roger Gracie style.
And ultimately, what does it matter when no one from that lineage steps on the mat with you when you are putting yourself out there in competition.
Stupid concept IMO.
And ultimately, what does it matter when no one from that lineage steps on the mat with you when you are putting yourself out there in competition.
Stupid concept IMO.
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
I think lineage is considered more important in arts where there are a lot of frauds. BJJ has had this problem since the UFC popularized the art back in the ‘90s and the demand for instructors quickly outstripped the supply. Jeet Kune Do had a similar problem in the ‘70s after Bruce Lee died and a lot of people started claiming to be JKD instructors. I know my BJJ and JKD lineages by heart. By contrast, I couldn’t tell you my judo lineage if you put a gun to my head. :)
Edited 2 year(s) ago
Black beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
Mitsuyo Maeda > Carlos Gracie Sr > Helio Gracie > Rolls Gracie > Carlos Gracie Jr > Marcio Feitosa > Mike Buckels > Beau Viehmann > Me
Eight including Rolls between Helio and Carlinhos which he does but I see some other people in this thread don't.
Eight including Rolls between Helio and Carlinhos which he does but I see some other people in this thread don't.
Black beltVerified
2 year(s) ago
Mitsuyo "Count Koma" Maeda - Carlos Gracie Sr. - Helio Gracie - Royler Gracie - Saulo Ribeiro - Xande Ribeiro - Dan Ward - Me
Black belt 4th degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Out of interest, who do you think has the longest lineage on Beltchecker? How many generations deep, with Maeda as number one? And what is the longest lineage on Beltchecker where it is easy to check all steps going back to at least the well known names of the 90:s? Not everyone agrees on from what degree (0:th-3:rd?) you should be able to promote others to BB. With low degree BB:s doing the deed, there can be a lot of new 'lineage generations' in a short time period, but that can also be the result of honoring your everyday instructor by adding him/her to the lineage even if the BB was formally from someone else. When I started training (mid 90:s), reviewing lineages was very easy. Basically all instructors sought out by gringos could tell their lineage in seconds, with very few levels involved. Now, I sometimes see really long ones with a lot of names I've never heard of and don't even find good info on through google. Not many years from now (if not already), I see a lot of BB claims will be totally unverifiable, when it comes to legitimacy through lineage. Perhaps, it's unavoidable that it will all just go back to being jiu-jitsu with some old traditionalists revering a few lineages with verifiability preserved over the years but that no young people will really care about, as everything in the game could just as well had been tested out and developed yesterday more or less from scratch by an AI (that could be fed with your own exact body type etc), with the same resulting style :-)
What about this question. I think this would be cool to know. Who or how many on belt checker can trace their lineage to someone either than a Gracie? Or even a non Maeda lineage?
Black belt 1st degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Maeda>Carlos Gracie Sr>Carlson Gracie Sr>Ricardo Cavalcanti>Me
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
2 year(s) ago
Kano > Maeda > Carlos Gracie > Helio Gracie > Royler Gracie > Moshe Kaitz > ME



