Rules for main forums
- Be nice
- No advertisement
- No events
- No fundraisers
- No topics asking for votes
- Only posts related to Brazilian Jiu Jitsu
Is there really a difference between Luta Livre and BJJ today?
6 year(s) ago • 2578 views • 23 replies
Black beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
In light of a certain belt dispute I got to wonder if there really is a difference between the two sports other then the fact the names are different. There was a bigger difference before, gi and nogi, but does that still apply, with the rise of, and now mainstream, nogi grappling ?
Now I'm only talking about the grappling part, not the history of it or the rivalry.
Now I'm only talking about the grappling part, not the history of it or the rivalry.
Black belt 2nd degreeVerifiedCanada 🇨🇦
6 year(s) ago
BJJ is a grappling system that utilizes a gi so there is a difference. Gi and No Gi have a lot of overlap but are two different systems.
Black belt 1st degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I've heard that way back when, jiu jitsu in Brazil was considered a 'Rich Man's Sport' with expensive tuition, and that luta livre was created by those that couldn't afford to train at the expensive academies (maybe couldn't afford gi's so was nogi by default).
But as far as today's style differences? No clue.
[EDIT]: Missed your "Now I'm only talking about the grappling part, not the history of it or the rivalry" part, so disregard what I said. lol
But as far as today's style differences? No clue.
[EDIT]: Missed your "Now I'm only talking about the grappling part, not the history of it or the rivalry" part, so disregard what I said. lol
Edited 6 year(s) ago
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Doesn't Luta Livre include extensive striking curriculum(s)?
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I know quite a few LL practicioners. Over the years, I have met and trained with people from the following lineages (Daniel D'Dane / Andyconda, Ruas Vale Tudo, Taifun Luta Livre, Paderborn Wombats, RTF / Nico Welko, Rio Fighters / Milton Viera / Mestre JOP, Fabio Peroba, Roberto Leitao)
They DO have a different approach than the regular, modern BJJ school...
Key points:
* Leglocks, heelhooks and cranks are taught and trained from day 1.
* Overall, LL has remained closer to its Vale Tudo roots than modern BJJ. Even white belts know how to strike & wrestle. In contrast, I know modern BJJ coloured belts who couldn't take down their grandmother (in a wheelchair).
* They tend to be tough bastards who don't cry when training gets a bit wild.
* They very much have and out-of-the-box approach to submissions. They sometimes deliberately concede position in order to set up sneaky subs.
* They emphasize SCRAMBLE or CHILL unexpectedly, in postions you wouldn't expect in BJJ. I've been reversed and out-scrambled by them in positions where I've shouldn't have been - but I was...
* If you thought BJJ politics was bad... Luta Livre has a staggering amount of in-fighting and feuds. Every lineage hates the other with a passion. Hence, it was nearly impossible to get organized into a unified front against BJJ.
I have a tremendous amount of respect for that style.
Re: the recent controversy. I don't understand the reason why certain LL people would want to rebrand themselves as BJJ.
They DO have a different approach than the regular, modern BJJ school...
Key points:
* Leglocks, heelhooks and cranks are taught and trained from day 1.
* Overall, LL has remained closer to its Vale Tudo roots than modern BJJ. Even white belts know how to strike & wrestle. In contrast, I know modern BJJ coloured belts who couldn't take down their grandmother (in a wheelchair).
* They tend to be tough bastards who don't cry when training gets a bit wild.
* They very much have and out-of-the-box approach to submissions. They sometimes deliberately concede position in order to set up sneaky subs.
* They emphasize SCRAMBLE or CHILL unexpectedly, in postions you wouldn't expect in BJJ. I've been reversed and out-scrambled by them in positions where I've shouldn't have been - but I was...
* If you thought BJJ politics was bad... Luta Livre has a staggering amount of in-fighting and feuds. Every lineage hates the other with a passion. Hence, it was nearly impossible to get organized into a unified front against BJJ.
I have a tremendous amount of respect for that style.
Re: the recent controversy. I don't understand the reason why certain LL people would want to rebrand themselves as BJJ.
Edited 6 year(s) ago
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
There are no striking curriculum in Luta Livre esportiva, which is the main style of Luta Livre taught. Some Luta Livre coaches, also have knowledge in Muay Thai and MMA and teach a style of Luta livre that was geared toward Vale Tudo, or MMA. However, in today's standards, that's rare.
As far as I know, from experience, and from what I've told by my peers. Luta Livre focuses more on wrestling for positions and submissions. The guard is not a subject of emphasis as much as it is in BJJ. You're incited to take people down and submit them. If you're not able to get the person down, you're incited to either stand back up, or find your way to a submission. In fact, when my Luta livre coaches runs competitions, he has his own set of rules where there's no points for sweeps.
The submission system varies from teachers to teachers. My coach does not teach neck cranks or spinelocks but he teaches everything else, whether you're a beginner or not. Of course we don't teach heel hooks on the first class, but we build up to it. We drill knee reaping techniques, but we very rarely do, not to confuse the competitors who can't do it in most competitions.
As far as I know, from experience, and from what I've told by my peers. Luta Livre focuses more on wrestling for positions and submissions. The guard is not a subject of emphasis as much as it is in BJJ. You're incited to take people down and submit them. If you're not able to get the person down, you're incited to either stand back up, or find your way to a submission. In fact, when my Luta livre coaches runs competitions, he has his own set of rules where there's no points for sweeps.
The submission system varies from teachers to teachers. My coach does not teach neck cranks or spinelocks but he teaches everything else, whether you're a beginner or not. Of course we don't teach heel hooks on the first class, but we build up to it. We drill knee reaping techniques, but we very rarely do, not to confuse the competitors who can't do it in most competitions.
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
To sum up the differences I would say, Luta livre practitioners tend to be much better wrestlers than BJJ guys standing, and what they lack in guard work, they compensate by standing back up, and wrestling again. They're also, generally speaking, very opportunistic in their hunt for the submission and they're less afraid of the positions.
EDIT : I also forgot to mention, they're also much more knowledgeable in every type of submission whether you consider them dirty or not.
EDIT : I also forgot to mention, they're also much more knowledgeable in every type of submission whether you consider them dirty or not.
Edited 6 year(s) ago
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
Re: the recent controversy. I don't understand the reason why certain LL people would want to rebrand themselves as BJJ.
If you're talking about Luta livre professors getting a black belt in BJJ and rebranding themselves as BJJ coaches, it's mostly due to them wanting to broaden their students base, and getting a bit of the BJJ pie, which, let's be honest, is a lot bigger than the LL pie. It's a shame, but I understand.
It's a shame because that's how styles like catch wrestling in Europe almost completly disappeared, or jiu jitsu before it hit Brazil, but at the same time, I can understand why a very proficient grappler would want to earn a good living teaching grappling, and not be pigeonholed because their style isn't that fashionable.
It's a shame because that's how styles like catch wrestling in Europe almost completly disappeared, or jiu jitsu before it hit Brazil, but at the same time, I can understand why a very proficient grappler would want to earn a good living teaching grappling, and not be pigeonholed because their style isn't that fashionable.
Black beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
So If I'm understanding this right, the only difference is they generally train a bit different then mainstream BJJ?
Which comes back to that there really isn't anything that separates the two in terms of grappling. Having different styles and different emphasis isn't really enough to separate the two. Different teachers have different styles and priorities regardless of sport.
Of course the origin is different, just talking about comparing the grappling part itself.
Which comes back to that there really isn't anything that separates the two in terms of grappling. Having different styles and different emphasis isn't really enough to separate the two. Different teachers have different styles and priorities regardless of sport.
Of course the origin is different, just talking about comparing the grappling part itself.
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
So If I'm understanding this right, the only difference is they generally train a bit different then mainstream BJJ?
Now that BJJ poached most of Luta livre's techniques (and in particular the Danaher's school), pretty much, yes.
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I would like all that be branded into jiu-jitsu (without the B) and give the finger to trad. guys on the fringe.
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
I would like all that be branded into jiu-jitsu (without the B) and give the finger to trad. guys on the fringe.
From a historical standpoint I can't support the idea of calling it all JJ, but grappling, so that we could incorporate the catch wrestling styles (which Luta Livre is a part of) that I could get behind. However, whether I like it or not, it looks like it's becoming that way, just JJ.
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
Grappling is too identity-less word including also all other wrestling styles...
Catch had influence from japanese JJ during early 20th century as well.
Catch had influence from japanese JJ during early 20th century as well.
Black beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
So If I'm understanding this right, the only difference is they generally train a bit different then mainstream BJJ? Which comes back to that there really isn't anything that separates the two in terms of grappling. Having different styles and different emphasis isn't really enough to separate the two. Different teachers have different styles and priorities regardless of sport.
Well, I think it's reasonable to expect a BJJ black belt to be fairly knowledgeable about things such as the spider guard, lasso guard, collar-sleeve, DLR etc. Apparently (I have no personal experience with Luta Livre, just what I've read from here) LL doesn't teach you this, whereas in BJJ the guardwork is a major component. Thus the ranks shouldn't be interchangeable, as in black belt in LL doesn't mean the person is necessary a black belt level in BJJ (even though in "submission grappling" they very well might be). 10p is a bit different in the sense that they also emphasize the guard a lot, so they're likely to pick up the few gi-specific variations very quickly.
We have a bunch of pro MMA guys training at the gym who grapple a ton, but I think they're all white or blue belts in BJJ, even though we have the same head coach for BJJ & MMA. (Except for one guy who was a purple before transitioning to MMA...) Only time the belt rank matters is if they ever put on a gi or enter a grappling tournament that separates different belt colors.
We have a bunch of pro MMA guys training at the gym who grapple a ton, but I think they're all white or blue belts in BJJ, even though we have the same head coach for BJJ & MMA. (Except for one guy who was a purple before transitioning to MMA...) Only time the belt rank matters is if they ever put on a gi or enter a grappling tournament that separates different belt colors.
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
The ranks in BJJ and Luta Livre don't even match, other than black belts.
In BJJ we have :
White - blue - purple - brown - black
In LL we have :
White - yellow - orange - blue - purple - brown - black
So other than at black belts, the ranks are hard to compare.
In BJJ we have :
White - blue - purple - brown - black
In LL we have :
White - yellow - orange - blue - purple - brown - black
So other than at black belts, the ranks are hard to compare.
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I feel like there's a general overthinking this LL/JJ belts and also what nowadays makes JJ and LL different.
In my opinion the differences where more pronounced in the past and mostly revolved around different emphasis in wrestling phase and guard game, but very soon LL and JJ people started to compete in pretty much the same circuits and it seems to me that at the moment there are very few set of rules around which everyone works: MMA, IBJJF rules in or without the gi, ADCC and sub only. This means that LL and JJ schools are training for pretty much the same kind of competitions and being "forced" to work around the same rules, the differences shrank noticeably. Tons of cross-training moved us all even closer to each other.
There are schools of 100% LL lineage who compete in IBJJF no gi tournaments and they just go with the belt level they hold in LL, considering white, yellow and orange as a jiu-jitsu white belt, and going on the same path from blue on. This does not bother me in the slightest because there are also jiu-jitsu schools who use a green belt for adults as intermediate step between white and blue, and I remember SBG Ireland (please correct me if I'm wrong) having two belts between white and blue (white with blue line and blue with white line) which are still considered white belts when it comes to competition time.
Nowadays I feel like there's more division inside BJJ lineages between people focusing on the gi aspect (IBJJF rules monopoly) and people focusing on the no gi (vastly around sub only and MMA), than there is inside the no gi scene between LL and BJJ lineages.
Incidentally, because of this I have no problem at all in having LL people checking their belts on this website, without any need for changing website name or whatsoever else; but I also recognise that my point of view it's easier to understand if you live in Germany, where the no gi jiu-jitsu / luta livre intersection is strong due to the strong luta livre presence on the territory, than if you live in Italy for example which is a IBJJF gi jiu-jitsu kingdom.
In my opinion the differences where more pronounced in the past and mostly revolved around different emphasis in wrestling phase and guard game, but very soon LL and JJ people started to compete in pretty much the same circuits and it seems to me that at the moment there are very few set of rules around which everyone works: MMA, IBJJF rules in or without the gi, ADCC and sub only. This means that LL and JJ schools are training for pretty much the same kind of competitions and being "forced" to work around the same rules, the differences shrank noticeably. Tons of cross-training moved us all even closer to each other.
There are schools of 100% LL lineage who compete in IBJJF no gi tournaments and they just go with the belt level they hold in LL, considering white, yellow and orange as a jiu-jitsu white belt, and going on the same path from blue on. This does not bother me in the slightest because there are also jiu-jitsu schools who use a green belt for adults as intermediate step between white and blue, and I remember SBG Ireland (please correct me if I'm wrong) having two belts between white and blue (white with blue line and blue with white line) which are still considered white belts when it comes to competition time.
Nowadays I feel like there's more division inside BJJ lineages between people focusing on the gi aspect (IBJJF rules monopoly) and people focusing on the no gi (vastly around sub only and MMA), than there is inside the no gi scene between LL and BJJ lineages.
Incidentally, because of this I have no problem at all in having LL people checking their belts on this website, without any need for changing website name or whatsoever else; but I also recognise that my point of view it's easier to understand if you live in Germany, where the no gi jiu-jitsu / luta livre intersection is strong due to the strong luta livre presence on the territory, than if you live in Italy for example which is a IBJJF gi jiu-jitsu kingdom.
Edited 6 year(s) ago
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
So let's say I would want to do the opposite - for marketing purposes and out of personal curiosity, I'd like to become a LL beltholder AND would like to advertise my school as LL and BJJ. What would it take? How should I proceed? Would it make any sense :D ?
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I know quite a few LL practicioners. Over the years, I have met and trained with people from the following lineages (Daniel D'Dane / Andyconda, Ruas Vale Tudo, Taifun Luta Livre, Paderborn Wombats, RTF / Nico Welko, Rio Fighters / Milton Viera / Mestre JOP, Fabio Peroba, Roberto Leitao) They DO have a different approach than the regular, modern BJJ school... Key points: * Leglocks, heelhooks and cranks are taught and trained from day 1. * Overall, LL has remained closer to its Vale Tudo roots than modern BJJ. Even white belts know how to strike & wrestle. In contrast, I know modern BJJ coloured belts who couldn't take down their grandmother (in a wheelchair). * They tend to be tough bastards who don't cry when training gets a bit wild. * They very much have and out-of-the-box approach to submissions. They sometimes deliberately concede position in order to set up sneaky subs. * They emphasize SCRAMBLE or CHILL unexpectedly, in postions you wouldn't expect in BJJ. I've been reversed and out-scrambled by them in positions where I've shouldn't have been - but I was... * If you thought BJJ politics was bad... Luta Livre has a staggering amount of in-fighting and feuds. Every lineage hates the other with a passion. Hence, it was nearly impossible to get organized into a unified front against BJJ. I have a tremendous amount of respect for that style. Re: the recent controversy. I don't understand the reason why certain LL people would want to rebrand themselves as BJJ.
hmm.... so after reading this it seems...
i am a Luta Livre Blackbelt disguised in a gi, thx daniel.
also there is a yellow and orange belt in bjj if i remember correctly but its for kids
when people would ask me about my style i would sometimes actually say catch as catch can cause i never identified with that systematic slow crush mentality of bjj
but then again i like to wear a gi too so i cant say im a catch wrestler.
serious identity crisis right there...
i am a Luta Livre Blackbelt disguised in a gi, thx daniel.
also there is a yellow and orange belt in bjj if i remember correctly but its for kids
when people would ask me about my style i would sometimes actually say catch as catch can cause i never identified with that systematic slow crush mentality of bjj
but then again i like to wear a gi too so i cant say im a catch wrestler.
serious identity crisis right there...
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
So let's say I would want to do the opposite - for marketing purposes and out of personal curiosity, I'd like to become a LL beltholder AND would like to advertise my school as LL and BJJ. What would it take? How should I proceed? Would it make any sense :D ?
If it makes sense to you, go on. If you have no LL teacher/contact/training partner, I don't see why you would do it (neither I know anyone who would do it) but whatever. Life will take care of it without me going on the webs to fingerpoint. I do know a guy (we all do) who holds a LL black belt but promotes his school as a JJ school because (I suppose?) he trains and learns and interacts mostly and since a while now with JJ people. If that's the scene where he feels he belongs, I'm fine with it because the expertise and the credentials are big enough to cover the gap in lineage. If tomorrow he would declare himself a JJ black belt I would have a problem with it but it doesn't seem to be the case.
I have a LL blue belt by the way, I could advertise my no gi classes as LL classes. I don't do it because I'm fully comfortable with my JJ lineage.
I have a LL blue belt by the way, I could advertise my no gi classes as LL classes. I don't do it because I'm fully comfortable with my JJ lineage.
Edited 6 year(s) ago
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
serious identity crisis right there...
C'mon Alex. It's the 21st century. You can identify as whoever you want and change that based on how you feel and obviously wear clothing according to that current identity. You're also welcome to mix and match :)
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
To clarify: I'm more curious about judo actually nowadays and if I get a bit of more time on my hands would like to go more in depth learning that as an adult and hobbyist and see what thats like. To pursue belts in LL at my current stage where I've never taken specific interest in that line/heritage before would sound a bit gimmicky and forced for me.
I was just curious about how LL would work.
I was just curious about how LL would work.
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
If only I had time, I would study karate again. As for LL, I wouldn't mind keep getting belts there, it would be a cool addition for the sake of it, but again I have no time to interact with any LL teacher enough for the promotion to have a meaning.
Black belt 2nd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
C'mon Alex. It's the 21st century. You can identify as whoever you want and change that based on how you feel and obviously wear clothing according to that current identity. You're also welcome to mix and match :)
thank u ❤
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
So let's say I would want to do the opposite - for marketing purposes and out of personal curiosity, I'd like to become a LL beltholder AND would like to advertise my school as LL and BJJ. What would it take? How should I proceed? Would it make any sense :D ?
We actually talked about it with Morcegao at the same camp where you and I met. David said that recently he went and trained with Milton Vieira in Rio for like a month, and came back with a brown belt in LL, because Milton said that he'd never heard of a guy going straight from white to black in Luta Livre.
My own LL coach, Fabrice Nolbas actually started by doing BJJ and went all the way up to black belt. He started training LL about half way in his BJJ progression I believe, but shortly after he got his BJJ black belt he developped some serious hand problems after a motorcycle accident. His hands would get completly locked after training and he couldn't move his fingers for long periods of time post training. He started completely focusing on LL under Flavio Peroba then and became one of the best nogi competitors in France in his weight class. He was at the time also going to Brazil once a year and trained at the aritano barbosa's gym in Rio. Aritano gave him his black belt in Luta livre and he also gives us our certifications if we want one. It's basically like the JJ affiliations (just cheaper lol).
However, I'd love to know how it all went down back when Carlson and BTT started doing mixed training of LL and BJJ.
My own LL coach, Fabrice Nolbas actually started by doing BJJ and went all the way up to black belt. He started training LL about half way in his BJJ progression I believe, but shortly after he got his BJJ black belt he developped some serious hand problems after a motorcycle accident. His hands would get completly locked after training and he couldn't move his fingers for long periods of time post training. He started completely focusing on LL under Flavio Peroba then and became one of the best nogi competitors in France in his weight class. He was at the time also going to Brazil once a year and trained at the aritano barbosa's gym in Rio. Aritano gave him his black belt in Luta livre and he also gives us our certifications if we want one. It's basically like the JJ affiliations (just cheaper lol).
However, I'd love to know how it all went down back when Carlson and BTT started doing mixed training of LL and BJJ.
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
I feel like there's a general overthinking this LL/JJ belts and also what nowadays makes JJ and LL different. In my opinion the differences where more pronounced in the past and mostly revolved around different emphasis in wrestling phase and guard game, but very soon LL and JJ people started to compete in pretty much the same circuits and it seems to me that at the moment there are very few set of rules around which everyone works: MMA, IBJJF rules in or without the gi, ADCC and sub only. This means that LL and JJ schools are training for pretty much the same kind of competitions and being 'forced' to work around the same rules, the differences shrank noticeably. Tons of cross-training moved us all even closer to each other. There are schools of 100% LL lineage who compete in IBJJG no gi tournaments and they just go with the belt level they hold in LL, considering white, yellow and orange as a jiu-jitsu white belt, and going on the same path from blue on. This does not bother me in the slightest because there are also jiu-jitsu schools who use a green belt for adults as intermediate step between white and blue, and I remember SBG Ireland (please correct me if I'm wrong) having two belts between white and blue (white with blue line and blue with white line) which are still considered white belts when it comes to competition time. Nowadays I feel like there's more division inside BJJ lineages between people focusing on the gi aspect (IBJJF rules monopoly) and people focusing on the no gi (vastly around sub only and MMA), than there is inside the no gi scene between LL and BJJ lineages. Incidentally, because of this I have no problem at all in having LL people checking their belts on this website, without any need for changing website name or whatsoever else; but I also recognise that my point of view it's easier to understand if you live in Germany, where the no gi jiu-jitsu / luta livre intersection is strong due to the strong luta livre presence on the territory, than if you live in Italy for example which is a IBJJG gi jiu-jitsu kingdom.
This is a very valid point. Makes me think about reconsidering this whole thing.
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
Nowadays I feel like there's more division inside BJJ lineages between people focusing on the gi aspect (IBJJF rules monopoly) and people focusing on the no gi (vastly around sub only and MMA), than there is inside the no gi scene between LL and BJJ lineages.
That is very true. Especially now that after Danaher's success, people are training heel hooks more than ever in the BJJ scene.
Black belt 3rd degreeVerified
6 year(s) ago
We actually talked about it with Morcegao at the same camp where you and I met. David said that recently he went and trained with Milton Vieira in Rio for like a month, and came back with a brown belt in LL, because Milton said that he'd never heard of a guy going straight from white to black in Luta Livre. My own LL coach, Fabrice Nolbas actually started by doing BJJ and went all the way up to black belt. He started training LL about half way in his BJJ progression I believe, but shortly after he got his BJJ black belt he developped some serious hand problems after a motorcycle accident. His hands would get completly locked after training and he couldn't move his fingers for long periods of time post training. He started completely focusing on LL under Flavio Peroba then and became one of the best nogi competitors in France in his weight class. He was at the time also going to Brazil once a year and trained at the aritano barbosa's gym in Rio. Aritano gave him his black belt in Luta livre and he also gives us our certifications if we want one. It's basically like the JJ affiliations (just cheaper lol). However, I'd love to know how it all went down back when Carlson and BTT started doing mixed training of LL and BJJ.
After the big rivalry ended, Gracie Barra and Carlson actively recruited LL black belts for their no gi / mma programs. Cacareco comes to mind
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
After the big rivalry ended, Gracie Barra and Carlson actively recruited LL black belts for their no gi / mma programs. Cacareco comes to mind
Yeah, also Milton Vieira and Flavio Peroba for example. Flavio then got recruited to teach in France, and made Luta livre big here.
Purple beltVerified
6 year(s) ago
What I wonder about it though, is how these LL black belts evolved in the JJ ranking system, because they all ended up getting their black belts eventually. Did they go straight to black? Maybe not, but I wonder.


