I would have a little bit of skepticism about Andrew Huberman, I'd actually argue he is very much bro science. In a different sense to Joe Rogan, but he's definitely the go to for a lot of 'bros' who try to be scientific. He has some useful stuff to say, but he is also often misrepresenting the science he is citing. My general rule of thumb regarding these things - ask yourself what his expertise is in, and listen to him in that regard only. Andrew Huberman is a Neuroscientist, so I would put some weight behind his thoughts on neuroscience. His views on exercise and nutrition, however, I would be a bit more careful before assuming what he's saying is correct. For nutrition for example, someone like Dr Layne Norton is definitely a better option to listen to.