Rules for main forums
- Be nice
- No advertisement
- No events
- No fundraisers
- No topics asking for votes
- Only posts related to Brazilian Jiu Jitsu
Very simple strategy for situational sparring instruction? Any comments?
5 month(s) ago • 313 views • 8 replies
HLPurple beltVerified
5 month(s) ago
Ecological No-Gi Grappling: The Strategic Chain
1. Influence & Off-balancing (Kuzushi)
Principle: Do not attack a "wall" (a ready and braced posture).
Action: Use a grip, a push, or a wedge to force the opponent to correct their balance.
Why: When an opponent is busy recovering their balance, they cannot simultaneously defend their "gates" (the space between their limbs).
2. Angling & Approach
Principle: Get the limbs out of the way.
Action: Immediately following the off-balance, move to an angle where the opponent’s limbs (wedges) are no longer between you and their "box" (the torso).
Why: Attacking directly from the front is inefficient; moving to an angle is a mechanical "fast lane" to passing.
3. Controlling the Center (The Connection)
Principle: "Chest-to-Chest" or "Chest-to-Back."
Action: Once the limbs are bypassed, fill the empty space immediately. Do not leave any air between you.
Why: Chest-to-chest contact kills the opponent’s mobility and their ability to recover guard. At this stage, you have "won" the position.
4. Limb Isolation
Principle: Lever away from the box.
Action: Once you control the torso (the box), isolate one limb (a lever) away from the rest of the body.
Why: A submission (choke or joint lock) is only possible once the target limb is isolated from the support and strength of the opponent's core.
The Summary:
OFF-BALANCE (Opens the door)
ANGLE (Walks through the door)
CONTACT (Locks the door)
ISOLATION (Finishes the job)
1. Influence & Off-balancing (Kuzushi)
Principle: Do not attack a "wall" (a ready and braced posture).
Action: Use a grip, a push, or a wedge to force the opponent to correct their balance.
Why: When an opponent is busy recovering their balance, they cannot simultaneously defend their "gates" (the space between their limbs).
2. Angling & Approach
Principle: Get the limbs out of the way.
Action: Immediately following the off-balance, move to an angle where the opponent’s limbs (wedges) are no longer between you and their "box" (the torso).
Why: Attacking directly from the front is inefficient; moving to an angle is a mechanical "fast lane" to passing.
3. Controlling the Center (The Connection)
Principle: "Chest-to-Chest" or "Chest-to-Back."
Action: Once the limbs are bypassed, fill the empty space immediately. Do not leave any air between you.
Why: Chest-to-chest contact kills the opponent’s mobility and their ability to recover guard. At this stage, you have "won" the position.
4. Limb Isolation
Principle: Lever away from the box.
Action: Once you control the torso (the box), isolate one limb (a lever) away from the rest of the body.
Why: A submission (choke or joint lock) is only possible once the target limb is isolated from the support and strength of the opponent's core.
The Summary:
OFF-BALANCE (Opens the door)
ANGLE (Walks through the door)
CONTACT (Locks the door)
ISOLATION (Finishes the job)
FFBlack belt 2nd degreeVerified
5 month(s) ago
Ecological would be how you train these ideas, not the ideas itself. We always go back to the same point: cool slide! How do you train it?
Also, what you call "Principles" are all concepts, a principle is something else.
What you call "Actions" are actually the concept, and action would be an example of how I apply this concept. A clear example that tells me what to do, "get to an angle" doesn't qualify as such.
Chest to chest and chest to back are orientation in space, not positions neither connections.
Also, what you call "Principles" are all concepts, a principle is something else.
What you call "Actions" are actually the concept, and action would be an example of how I apply this concept. A clear example that tells me what to do, "get to an angle" doesn't qualify as such.
Chest to chest and chest to back are orientation in space, not positions neither connections.
HLPurple beltVerified
5 month(s) ago
Thank you Francesco for your input. Semantics are always important in communication.
I am looking for practical issues/advice. Point of views that are related to actual rolling. It can be techniques, but more about WHY something is done.
Lets say in stand up, I get a russian 2 on 1. What do I do with it? It gets a limb redirected - not in my way. I get access to his center of gravity to unbalance him - takedown is some way. There are very many details for russian 2 on 1, but wouldn't it be good enough if it works?
Or should you pay more attention to details and make it thighter because more experienced wrestles will have better answers against your grip/ tie-up?
I am trying to figure out something to continuesly repeat to fairly new grapplers. I do explain techniques and we use names of techniques to communicate, because it is easier to explain what they are doing. I am more about "why" - what is the most essential task at each moment. How is important, but it comes after "why".
So first we need a way to affect our opponent - their posture and/or balance. Some kind of grip, tie-up, push..
We need to get some kind of control of their center of gravity to unbalance and most likely need to get his limbs or head away from our way.
We unbalance our opponent, but we need also to prevent him from gaining back his balance.
To control or stabilaze our takedown often chest to chest or chest to back is a simple instruction.
Next would be isolating arm, leg, neck and going for some kind of finish.
I am looking for practical issues/advice. Point of views that are related to actual rolling. It can be techniques, but more about WHY something is done.
Lets say in stand up, I get a russian 2 on 1. What do I do with it? It gets a limb redirected - not in my way. I get access to his center of gravity to unbalance him - takedown is some way. There are very many details for russian 2 on 1, but wouldn't it be good enough if it works?
Or should you pay more attention to details and make it thighter because more experienced wrestles will have better answers against your grip/ tie-up?
I am trying to figure out something to continuesly repeat to fairly new grapplers. I do explain techniques and we use names of techniques to communicate, because it is easier to explain what they are doing. I am more about "why" - what is the most essential task at each moment. How is important, but it comes after "why".
So first we need a way to affect our opponent - their posture and/or balance. Some kind of grip, tie-up, push..
We need to get some kind of control of their center of gravity to unbalance and most likely need to get his limbs or head away from our way.
We unbalance our opponent, but we need also to prevent him from gaining back his balance.
To control or stabilaze our takedown often chest to chest or chest to back is a simple instruction.
Next would be isolating arm, leg, neck and going for some kind of finish.
HLPurple beltVerified
5 month(s) ago
Ecological would be how you train these ideas, not the ideas itself. We always go back to the same point: cool slide! How do you train it? Also, what you call "Principles" are all concepts, a principle is something else. What you call "Actions" are actually the concept, and action would be an example of how I apply this concept. A clear example that tells me what to do, "get to an angle" doesn't qualify as such. Chest to chest and chest to back are orientation in space, not positions neither connections.
To Francescos question on "how do you train it?" I use short situational sparring with often constrainds to both players. Short tasks with lots of reps. I ask them to start easy, and intensity will always increase during training because it is a game and both want to "win". I think it is a good thing because it becomes more realistic. Often situational sparring tasks are getting more complex during weeks of training. I just add new "problems" or new tasks or compine already "drilled" situations. Drilled for me means something that has been learned and practised - not just dead reps.
Most often after some kind of warm up, I start with handfighting and unbalancing situations. Next "technique" might be playing seated guard vs standing opponent. After that it could be supine/"grilled chicken" guard against standing opponent.
It is not very much different from "drilling" a compination of guard passes like knee cut, knee slide, leg drag, stack pass all at the same time. Guard player needs to react on various situations and also guard passed needs to react to guard retentions moves.
Sparring is sparring. Only difference is where to start and went to stop and what are the instructions given to each player. I do share my thought - maybe too much. I am not an actual ecological dynamics or approach fan. BUT I am a fan of progressive resistance and trying to use all the skills grappler has learned else where even before they start learning grappling.
Most often after some kind of warm up, I start with handfighting and unbalancing situations. Next "technique" might be playing seated guard vs standing opponent. After that it could be supine/"grilled chicken" guard against standing opponent.
It is not very much different from "drilling" a compination of guard passes like knee cut, knee slide, leg drag, stack pass all at the same time. Guard player needs to react on various situations and also guard passed needs to react to guard retentions moves.
Sparring is sparring. Only difference is where to start and went to stop and what are the instructions given to each player. I do share my thought - maybe too much. I am not an actual ecological dynamics or approach fan. BUT I am a fan of progressive resistance and trying to use all the skills grappler has learned else where even before they start learning grappling.
RBlack belt 3rd degreeVerified
5 month(s) ago
It seems to me that things are being made more complicated than they need to be.
At the end of the day, BJJ, grappling, or judo are not complex systems. They are built on simple, fundamental principles—posture, balance, base, control, and timing.
What’s actually difficult is not the techniques themselves, but the time it takes for the body to adapt and react naturally. That only comes through repetition and consistency, not overthinking.
From my perspective, you’re searching for answers in a very complicated way. I think it would be much more effective to stay grounded in the basics and really focus on the core principles.
Can you clarify how you see this? How do you understand the role of fundamentals and principles in BJJ, grappling, and judo?
Kind regards,
Robert
At the end of the day, BJJ, grappling, or judo are not complex systems. They are built on simple, fundamental principles—posture, balance, base, control, and timing.
What’s actually difficult is not the techniques themselves, but the time it takes for the body to adapt and react naturally. That only comes through repetition and consistency, not overthinking.
From my perspective, you’re searching for answers in a very complicated way. I think it would be much more effective to stay grounded in the basics and really focus on the core principles.
Can you clarify how you see this? How do you understand the role of fundamentals and principles in BJJ, grappling, and judo?
Kind regards,
Robert
HLPurple beltVerified
5 month(s) ago
It seems to me that things are being made more complicated than they need to be. At the end of the day, BJJ, grappling, or judo are not complex systems. They are built on simple, fundamental principles—posture, balance, base, control, and timing. What’s actually difficult is not the techniques themselves, but the time it takes for the body to adapt and react naturally. That only comes through repetition and consistency, not overthinking. From my perspective, you’re searching for answers in a very complicated way. I think it would be much more effective to stay grounded in the basics and really focus on the core principles. Can you clarify how you see this? How do you understand the role of fundamentals and principles in BJJ, grappling, and judo? Kind regards, Robert
I understand that it might seem complex. Fundamentals stay the same (posture, balance, base, connection, control, and timing). It is just how to use them. Rob Biernacki has his leavers, frames, force vectors, wedges, and different controls. Ofcourse we can say keep or get your posture and try to break opponents and unbalance opponent, but don't give your center of gravity to them and so on. Yes it works and Rob repeats it until it is a natural part of grapplers thinking.
It works.
One can use fundamentals when discussion a) how to remove "sticks" to close distance b) Posture when stabilizing or pinning opponent and so on.
Challenge is that playing games / situational sparring is not a very complex way of learning, but Robert, your point about fundamentals is valid. It is essential for students to also understand the fundamentals so that they can apply fundamentals to different situations. Like in learning techniques, it is a very restricted situation when a move is valid. Many things need to click. One cannot spar all possible situations - so you need some kind of basics to keep you save when something new happens. And for new grapplers, it is new almost all the time.
I will try a very short instruction. Who is winning engagement? Who has dominate grips, posture and balance can close the distance to try to do the next step.
It works.
One can use fundamentals when discussion a) how to remove "sticks" to close distance b) Posture when stabilizing or pinning opponent and so on.
Challenge is that playing games / situational sparring is not a very complex way of learning, but Robert, your point about fundamentals is valid. It is essential for students to also understand the fundamentals so that they can apply fundamentals to different situations. Like in learning techniques, it is a very restricted situation when a move is valid. Many things need to click. One cannot spar all possible situations - so you need some kind of basics to keep you save when something new happens. And for new grapplers, it is new almost all the time.
I will try a very short instruction. Who is winning engagement? Who has dominate grips, posture and balance can close the distance to try to do the next step.
HLPurple beltVerified
5 month(s) ago
It seems to me that things are being made more complicated than they need to be. At the end of the day, BJJ, grappling, or judo are not complex systems. They are built on simple, fundamental principles—posture, balance, base, control, and timing. What’s actually difficult is not the techniques themselves, but the time it takes for the body to adapt and react naturally. That only comes through repetition and consistency, not overthinking. From my perspective, you’re searching for answers in a very complicated way. I think it would be much more effective to stay grounded in the basics and really focus on the core principles. Can you clarify how you see this? How do you understand the role of fundamentals and principles in BJJ, grappling, and judo? Kind regards, Robert
Robert wrote: "What’s actually difficult is not the techniques themselves, but the time it takes for the body to adapt and react naturally. That only comes through repetition and consistency, not overthinking."
When sparring, students do not overthing! That is why situational sparring is so good. Also idea to give simple instructions or clear tasks help students use their own already learnd skills. "Do it so that the job gets done".
My challenge is to figure out what is the actual most essential fight in easy situation. How do we win a scrample. In many cases it might be a very simple task.
Also repetition is an interesting issue. Not all reps are equal :-)
When sparring, students do not overthing! That is why situational sparring is so good. Also idea to give simple instructions or clear tasks help students use their own already learnd skills. "Do it so that the job gets done".
My challenge is to figure out what is the actual most essential fight in easy situation. How do we win a scrample. In many cases it might be a very simple task.
Also repetition is an interesting issue. Not all reps are equal :-)
HLPurple beltVerified
5 month(s) ago
I'll go back to following Rob Biernacki's way of teaching. It will be easier and also tested to get results.
So forget my question. All good.
So forget my question. All good.
RBlack belt 3rd degreeVerified
5 month(s) ago
Robert wrote: "What’s actually difficult is not the techniques themselves, but the time it takes for the body to adapt and react naturally. That only comes through repetition and consistency, not overthinking." When sparring, students do not overthing! That is why situational sparring is so good. Also idea to give simple instructions or clear tasks help students use their own already learnd skills. "Do it so that the job gets done". My challenge is to figure out what is the actual most essential fight in easy situation. How do we win a scrample. In many cases it might be a very simple task. Also repetition is an interesting issue. Not all reps are equal :-)
I see your point, and just to clarify, the part about overthinking was meant in relation to your original question.
What I find challenging is identifying what is truly essential in each situation. In many scrambles, the solution can be very simple, but recognizing it consistently is not always easy.
And I also agree on repetition, not all repetitions are equal. The quality and context of the reps make a big difference.
In any case, your questions are very interesting. Never stop questioning.
What I find challenging is identifying what is truly essential in each situation. In many scrambles, the solution can be very simple, but recognizing it consistently is not always easy.
And I also agree on repetition, not all repetitions are equal. The quality and context of the reps make a big difference.
In any case, your questions are very interesting. Never stop questioning.
