Lets review some profiles with a lot of evidence

Zeke · 2026-02-05T11:06:28+00:00

There are a lot of unverified profiles with pretty sparse evidence, and the whole ecosystem only works if we collectively review promotions and add corroboration. I’m noticing a handful of pending black belt and black+ profiles that seem well-supported and relatively uncontroversial, but they’ve been sitting unverified longer than I expected. If anyone has time to take a look and help confirm or dispute, this ecosystem will be better for it... Eric Huebner https://www.beltchecker.com/profile.php?id=191 Alexander Umantsev https://www.beltchecker.com/profile.php?id=2437 Manuel Aragon https://www.beltchecker.com/profile.php?id=52688 Heiko Schönborn https://www.beltchecker.com/profile.php?id=34112 Ciprian Carausu https://www.beltchecker.com/profile.php?id=52010 Craig Willey https://www.beltchecker.com/profile.php?id=22153 Justin Norton https://www.beltchecker.com/profile.php?id=802 Tim Guikema https://www.beltchecker.com/profile.php?id=38024 Shawn Lawrence…

8 month(s) ago • 2673 views • 61 replies

Johan

Black belt 3rd degreeVerified

1434 forum posts11665/1000

3 month(s) ago

I had a verified profile, just updated my belt to 1st Degree Black after 3 years at Black Belt, but no one is voting to verify it .... I just assumed people stop checking this site ?? I could use a little love !

You have no evidence at all pre BB (not even any non-evidence pics) and also have a quite long lineage that isn't easily verifiable through a quick google search. Dig up online promotion evidence from along the lineage yourself and share along with adding evidence and pics from colored belts and I'm sure you'd get verified.

Christian Graugart

Black belt 4th degreeVerified

4342 forum posts40245/1000

3 month(s) ago

Moving this thread to "ask for votes" forum

Welcome to ask for votes forum

Lets review some profiles with a lot of evidence

Posting disabled

Post a reply